Planned Parenthood shootings in Colo-a.jpg

The Cruel Consequences of Anti-Abortion Hate

Rachel Cohen Dec 1, 2015

THE RIGHT wing's attacks on women's access to abortion once again turned deadly last Friday.

Colorado Spring police arrested Robert L. Dear six hours after he entered a Planned Parenthood facility wielding an AK-47 rifle. By then, he had murdered three people and wounded nine others.

For days, the mainstream media refused to "speculate" about Dear's motives–a restraint that certainly didn't characterize their coverage of the Paris terror attacks two weeks before. Even after witnesses reported that Dear uttered the phrase "No more baby parts" during his arrest, police claimed the shooter's intentions required further investigation.

President Barack Obama issued a statement as the attack was still unfolding, calling for action to curtail gun access and support for the law-enforcement officials on the scene. Obama didn't use the words "women," "abortion" or even "health care" once.

His message may have resonated with many people who know Colorado Springs as a place where right-wing ideas flourish–and Colorado as a state where lawmakers were successfully recalled in 2013 after they supported gun-control legislation.

But Obama's decision to dodge any comment about women's right to access abortion as health care was cowardly–a sign of his unwillingness, common among his fellow Democrats, to take a clear stand in defense of women's rights and the lives of patients and health-care providers.

Colorado's Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper likewise urged his constituents to "tone down the rhetoric" in debates about abortion. "I think we should have a discussion at least urging caution when we discuss some of these issues, so we don't get people to a point of going out and committing violence," he said.

In other words, supporters of a women's right to choose abortion and of Planned Parenthood's mission of providing women's health care should hush up–or they might bear responsibility for the violence of the anti-abortion fanatics.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

TO ANYONE without an interest in burying their heads in the sand, Dear's words about "baby parts" were an obvious reference to slanderous allegations against Planned Parenthood taken up by Republican politicians from Congress to the presidential campaign trail.

The right wing seized on manipulated video footage concocted by the misnamed Center for Medical Progress (CMP) to make it seem like Planned Parenthood officials discussing the legal and medically vital practice of making fetal tissue from later-term abortions available for life-saving research were bragging about an illegal for-profit venture.

The infamous and now thoroughly debunked videos go way beyond "inflammatory rhetoric." They convey deliberate lies, which could land CMP in a courtroom, faced with criminal or civil prosecution.

The right's slander should have been easily recognized after similar right-wing video smear campaigns led a Democratic-controlled Congress to defund the anti-poverty organization ACORN in 2009 and the U.S. Department of Agriculture to fire civil rights veteran Shirley Sherrod in 2010.

Instead, the despicable allegations that Planned Parenthood "sells baby parts" were the subject of congressional hearings, with Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards facing hours of aggressive and condescending questioning by lawmakers. The claim has been taken up at the grassroots by anti-abortion organizations that picket outside clinics during coordinated national days of action.

Though CMP distanced itself from Robert Dear's violence, sections of the anti-choice right have openly endorsed terrorism in the past.

The right's effort to vilify abortion–a normal part of women's health care and necessary for women to enjoy any semblance of equality–as the "murder of unborn children" has provoked a consistent stream of violence over several decades, ranging from hundreds of acts of clinic vandalism to kidnapping, stalking, assault, attempted murder and the murder of eight abortion providers and clinic staff.

In the weeks following the release of CMP's videos against Planned Parenthood, four arson attacks struck Planned Parenthood facilities in Washington, California, Illinois and Louisiana.

Most Republicans likewise distanced themselves from Dear's actions–despite the fact that their attacks on Planned Parenthood in particular and abortion in general set the stage for such terrorism.

On Fox News Sunday, Carly Fiorina, a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination–and vocal defender of the CMP videos, even after they were debunked–said attempts to link the Colorado clinic shooting with anti-abortion rhetoric were "typical left-wing tactics."

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, another GOP presidential hopeful, had the gall to declare on the campaign trail in Iowa–in the absence of any evidence at all–that Dear is a "transgendered [sic] leftist activist."

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, yet another Republican presidential contender, told CNN that Dear's killings were "domestic terrorism"–but in the next breath equated Planned Parenthood's abortion services to Dear's mass murder. "[T]here's no excuse for killing other people, whether it's happening inside the Planned Parenthood headquarters, inside their clinics where many millions of babies die, or whether it's people attacking Planned Parenthood," Huckabee said.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

THE COLORADO Springs killings are another example of a frightening rise in right-wing terrorist attacks.

It comes on the heels of shootings attributed to white supremacist vigilantes against Black Lives Matter activists in Minneapolis. In that case, police have arrested three suspects who littered the Internet with hateful messages and open discussions of their planned attack–though authorities say they are still investigating whether to indict the men on hate crime charges or whether their assault on protesters might be considered "self-defense."

Other forms of hate violence have claimed lives and inflicted harm across the country. For example, activists and supporters have brought to light the murder of 22 trans women in 2015, a majority of whom were women of color.

Nor is the Planned Parenthood shooting the only attack of its kind in the city of Colorado Springs this year. In January, the city's NAACP office was damaged when Thaddeus Murphy set off an explosive device. Murphy's motives have also been portrayed as "murky," though his actions follow a long history of arson attacks against Black civil rights organizations.

The last murder attributed to anti-choice violence took the life of late-term abortion provider Dr. George Tiller in Wichita, Kansas, in 2009.

Tiller's practice in Kansas City had been a focal point of violence–including a 1986 bombing and 1993 shooting–and right-wing protest for years. The anti-choice movement has targeted later-term abortion providers for special demonization, and Tiller was one of only five providers of abortions after the stage of pregnancy in which a fetus is considered viable, or able to survive outside the womb.

The U.S. Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v. Wade decision guaranteed legality for abortions taking place before fetal viability, and indeed, the vast majority of abortions take place within the first eight weeks of pregnancy, before an embryo becomes a fetus.

But in rare cases, making up less than 1 percent of all abortions, a pregnancy is terminated after 24 weeks of pregnancy. This procedure almost always results from late-developing and severe health complications, but the right has cynically portrayed procedures involving the partial delivery of more developed fetuses as representative of all abortion practices.

Tiller's murder forced the closure of the last remaining abortion facility in Kansas City and left just four providers of later-term abortions to attempt to provide care for hundreds of parents annually facing the tragic ending of wanted pregnancies.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

DR. TILLER'S murder and this new terrorist attack in Colorado Springs show that anti-choice claims of concern for fetal life co-exist with the violent disregard for the lives of women and health care providers. But in truth, women's lives are on the line every time our right and access to reproductive justice is placed at risk.

Legislative attacks limiting access to abortion do the greatest harm to those who are most vulnerable to begin with. Several states have banned late-term abortions, forcing women carrying a severely ill fetus to make a choice between risking their safety, traveling great distances and paying thousands of dollars to terminate their pregnancies, or giving birth to children who will endure tremendous suffering for the duration of their very short lives.

Parental notification laws compel young women who may have violent or nonexistent relationships with their guardians to seek permission just to exercise control over their own bodies and lives. And mandatory waiting periods and counseling add to the expense of a procedure that has become unaffordable for many poor and working women.

The closure of clinics has been one of the right's most effective tactics in limiting reproductive rights in practice, with potentially life-threatening results. Six states now have only one abortion provider and 87 percent of counties nationwide have no abortion providers.

In its next term, the U.S. Supreme Court is due to rule on the constitutionality of a 2013 law passed in Texas amid mass protests. At the time that HB 2 was passed, Texas counted 41 abortion providers across its large expanse. Today, just 17 clinics remain, and more could be closed if the law is upheld by the Court.

A new study dramatizes the effects of the closures. Researchers asked Texas women if they or their best friend had attempted to induce an abortion on their own–and turned up between 100,000 and 240,000 estimated attempts. Even if these estimates double or triple the real number, they represent a massive number of people facing desperate and potentially dangerous circumstances.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

DISTURBINGLY, VICIOUS commentary appeared on social media during and after the attack on Planned Parenthood, cheering on and excusing Dear's terrorist assault and murders.

Self-proclaimed "pro-lifers" offered victim-blaming statements like "No sympathy for any pregnant female who was injured in the Planned Parenthood shooting that was there to get an abortion. She deserved it." Others degraded all Planned Parenthood patients as "lazy and slutty." Still others praised Dear as more effective at protecting Black "babies" than the Black Lives Matter movement.

The hypocrisy could not be more obvious. Each of the three people killed by Dear–police officer Garrett Swasey; Jennifer Markovsky, who was at the clinic to support a friend; and Ke'Arre Stewart, an Iraq war veteran–had children of their own.

Those applauding Dear's massacre on social media illustrate that the physical safety of oppressed people is under fire as a direct result of the right's attack on reproductive freedom–and the demand for abortion rights must be made without apology. As author and activist Jessica Valenti noted on social media:

In the wake of the attack on Planned Parenthood, I've noticed that a lot of well-meaning people are defending the organization by saying that it is not just an abortion clinic, or pointing out that abortion is just one small part of the services Planned Parenthood provides. This is the exact wrong sentiment right now…

Abortion is legal, abortion is moral. And right now, we must support Planned Parenthood BECAUSE of the abortions they provide, not in spite of them.

Now is the time to reiterate how important abortion care is to women's health and well-being–not just cancer screenings, not just contraception. Abortion. A procedure that saves lives, that offers freedom, bodily integrity, and equality…

We have nothing to gain by tempering our beliefs, and everything to lose. I ‪#‎StandWithPP‬ because they provide abortions.

Barack Obama and other political leaders will use the fact that law enforcement officers were among those killed and wounded by Dear to attempt to rehabilitate the role of police in public safety. But we can look to our own past struggles to see what really made a difference in keeping our rights and lives safe.

In the 1980s and 1990s, activists turned back a tide of anti-choice violence by standing up to the right in the streets and on the sidewalks in front of our clinics. Small groups of clinic defense activists united in action at the height of right-wing violence and blocked the actions of organizations like the Pro-Life Action League and Operation Rescue. These confrontations eventually won wider support and drew together enough participants to run the bigots back underground.

More than a decade after clinic defense, street protest and bottom-up organizing subsided, we can't afford to be apologetic or fearful about defending women's rights. We are long overdue for a new fighting movement that protects abortion as a part of the reproductive justice that every woman and everyone who can become pregnant deserves.

This article originally appeared at


Would You Let These Men Control Your Uterus?
By Amy Littlefield


Comments are closed.

Please Give Today!

Please give today to the Indypendent. It’s the generosity of readers like you who make all our work possible.

Give Now